Meditation Matters: Enhancing Learning Outcomes and Well-Being Among College Students

Meditation Matters: Enhancing Learning Outcomes and Well-Being Among College Students

 

Khritish Swargiary¹, Kavita Roy²

Research Assistant, EdTech Research Association, India¹.

Guest Faculty, Department of Education, Bongaigaon College, India².

Abstract: This study, led by faculty members and staff of the EdTech Research Association, rigorously examined the impact of a four-week meditation program on learning outcomes among college students. Employing a quasi-experimental design with pre-test and post-test measures, the research involved 50 college students randomly assigned to either the Meditation Group or the Control Group, emphasizing full-time participants committed to the entire program. Various research tools, including standardized tests, subjective assessments, and observation checklists, were utilized during structured meditation sessions led by a certified instructor. Ethical considerations were paramount throughout the research process. The detailed statistical analysis presented in Appendix-2 revealed significant improvements in learning outcomes, confidence, ability to apply principles, and a reduction in stress/anxiety within the Meditation Group compared to the Control Group. These findings substantiate the alternative hypothesis (H1) and indicate a positive impact of the meditation program on academic performance and well-being. Recommendations for educators, administrators, and policymakers include the integration of meditation programs, faculty training, and awareness-raising initiatives. However, acknowledgment of research limitations, such as issues related to external validity and sampling representativeness, is crucial for interpreting the study's findings and guiding future research efforts. In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the potential benefits of meditation on specific aspects of learning and well-being among college students.

 

Keywords: Meditation, Learning outcomes, Academic performance, College students, Stress reduction.

 

I. INTRODUCTION

 

Mindfulness is acknowledged as a meditative practice dedicated to fostering present moment awareness [1]. The term "mindfulness" finds its roots in the amalgamation of two Pali words, Sati, denoting "awareness," and Samprajanya, signifying "clear comprehension." The primary goal of mindfulness meditation remains the cultivation of inner tranquility and the impartial observation of the mind, allowing individuals to embrace and acknowledge each moment in its unaltered state across all facets of daily existence [2, 3]. A PubMed exploration into the concept of mindfulness unveils a discernible trajectory: 11 articles surfaced between 1980 and 1989; this number increased to 28 during the 1990s, surged to 510 between 2000 and 2010, and skyrocketed to a remarkable 2,263 articles from 2011 to August 2015. The extensive body of research on mindfulness meditation spans diverse mental and physical health domains, encompassing conditions such as major depression [4], cancer [5], HIV pathogenesis [6], multiple sclerosis [7], chronic low back pain [8], chronic insomnia [9], and chronic kidney disease [10].

The landscape of education is swiftly transforming in response to the forces of globalization, technological advancements, and cultural shifts. Academic professionals are finding themselves tasked with instructing ever-expanding cohorts of students within an environment characterized by unparalleled access to information and swift electronic communication. This amalgamation of factors has given rise to a learning environment where electronic online communication is increasingly supplanting face-to-face interactions between both staff and students. The pervasive perception of online technologies as the most efficient means to acquire new knowledge raises concerns about the diminishing role of personal interactions essential to the learning process (Attwood, 2009). As articulated by Light (2006), today's students do not align with the traditional beneficiaries our education system was originally designed to serve. McInnis (2003) aptly characterizes them as "multi-tasking, digitally connected," yet laments that a quarter of first-year students experience limited contact with their peers on campus, resulting in intellectual and emotional constraints due to perceived isolation. Despite substantial investments by universities in online course content and cognitive outcomes, measured through traditional educational methods (Birbeck & André, 2009), there has been a relative neglect of the emotional or affective dimensions of learning, especially within the realm of online education. Research endeavors exploring the significance of affective learning and teaching offer valuable insights into the practical implications for learning outcomes (Craig, 2011; Holland, 2006) and open the possibility that mindfulness meditation could contribute to enhancing psychological well-being in this evolving educational landscape.

In an era characterized by the relentless pursuit of academic excellence and the omnipresence of stress among students, alternative approaches to enhance learning outcomes and well-being are gaining attention. This study delves into the potential impact of a four-week meditation program on college students' academic performance, confidence levels, and stress management. As stress becomes an increasingly prevalent concern in educational settings, investigating interventions that promote both cognitive and emotional well-being is crucial. The study aims to contribute valuable insights into the intersection of contemplative practices and academic success, shedding light on the efficacy of meditation as a tool for fostering positive outcomes in higher education.

 

II. LITERATURE REVIEW

 

In light of the aforementioned studies by Chong, H. H., Koo, M., Tsai, T. H., & Chen, C. Y. (2015) and Ziaian, T., Sawyer, J., Evans, N., & Gillham, D. (2015), which explored the impact of mindfulness meditation on learning, cognitive performance, academic well-being, and affective teaching practices, our research aimed to build upon these findings by further investigating the effects of mindfulness meditation on cognitive performance and well-being among university students and academic staff. To achieve this objective, we proposed employing a mixed-methods approach that combined quantitative and qualitative measures. The quantitative aspect involved administering standardized assessments such as the College Learning Effectiveness Inventory (CLEI) and computer-based cognitive tasks to evaluate learning effectiveness, attention, memory, and other cognitive facets among university students undergoing mindfulness meditation training. We utilized a quasi-experimental pre/posttest design similar to the study conducted by Chong et al. (2015), with participants randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. Additionally, we incorporated qualitative methodologies, drawing from action research principles similar to the approach adopted by Ziaian et al. (2015). Through interviews, workshops, and reflective sessions, we aimed to explore the subjective experiences and perceptions of both students and academic staff engaged in mindfulness meditation programs. This qualitative component provided deeper insights into the affective domain of teaching and learning, as well as the psychological well-being of participants. Furthermore, considering the cultural context and diverse backgrounds of our participants, we ensured the adaptation and validation of research instruments to suit the specific demographic and linguistic characteristics of our target population, as demonstrated by Chong et al. (2015) in their study involving Taiwanese university students. Overall, by integrating quantitative assessments with qualitative inquiries and considering the findings from previous research, our study sought to contribute to the growing body of literature on mindfulness meditation's effects on cognitive performance, academic well-being, and teaching practices in the university setting.

 

III. METHODOLOGY

 

The methodology for this study was developed and executed by faculty members and staff of the EdTech Research Association, with Kavita Roy having served as a co-author and actively contributed to the design and implementation of the research. In this investigation, a quasi-experimental design with a pre-test and post-test approach was employed to scrutinize the impact of a four-week meditation program on learning outcomes among college students. A sample of 50 college students, spanning various academic disciplines, was selected, and through random allocation, participants were assigned to either the Meditation Group (n = 25) or the Control Group (n = 25) using convenience sampling techniques from a singular institution in Mumbai, India, while maintaining confidentiality standards. Inclusion criteria necessitated participants to be full-time students willing to commit to the entire four-week program and associated assessments, with exclusion criteria excluding students with prior meditation experience or undergoing concurrent stress management interventions. The research tools comprised a standardized test for pre-test and post-test evaluations, subjective assessments through self-report measures, and an observation checklist for objective assessment. The meditation program, implemented for the intervention group, consisted of 30-minute sessions led by a certified meditation instructor three times a week, incorporating mindfulness meditation and focused breathing exercises. The research procedure involved baseline assessments, random assignment, the intervention period, post-test assessments, and subsequent quantitative data analysis using paired and independent t-tests to determine statistical significance. Ethical considerations, including informed consent and adherence to ethical guidelines, were prioritized throughout the study. This comprehensive research methodology aimed to rigorously investigate the past effects of the meditation program on academic performance and well-being among college students.

 

IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

 

Please refer to Appendix-2 for the visualization of Chart-1, which illustrated the summarized pre-test and post-test scores for both the Meditation Group and the Control Group (n = 25) within each respective group. Pre-test scores were documented before the commencement of the four-week meditation program, while post-test scores were gathered subsequent to its completion.

To compare the pre-test and post-test scores between the Meditation Group and the Control Group, we computed the mean scores for each group and analyzed the disparities.

Pre-Test Scores:

Meditation Group (Pre-Test):

The mean pre-test score was calculated as (75 + 80 + 70 + 85 + 78 + 82 + 88 + 75 + 90 + 85 + 77 + 83 + 79 + 87 + 72 + 86 + 75 + 89 + 70 + 80 + 76 + 82 + 74 + 81 + 73) / 25, resulting in a mean pre-test score of approximately 80.16.

Control Group (Pre-Test):

The mean pre-test score was computed as (79 + 83 + 76 + 85 + 81 + 72 + 78 + 75 + 84 + 73 + 80 + 84 + 78 + 86 + 77 + 71 + 79 + 74 + 82 + 70 + 82 + 77 + 85 + 76 + 79) / 25, yielding a mean pre-test score of approximately 78.84.

 

Post-Test Scores:

Meditation Group (Post-Test):

The mean post-test score was determined as (85 + 90 + 82 + 92 + 88 + 91 + 93 + 86 + 94 + 90 + 87 + 89 + 88 + 91 + 84 + 92 + 86 + 94 + 85 + 87 + 83 + 89 + 84 + 90 + 82) / 25, resulting in a mean post-test score of approximately 88.44.

Control Group (Post-Test):

The mean post-test score was calculated as (80 + 85 + 79 + 88 + 83 + 74 + 80 + 76 + 87 + 75 + 81 + 86 + 80 + 89 + 82 + 73 + 81 + 77 + 86 + 74 + 83 + 78 + 87 + 79 + 81) / 25, yielding a mean post-test score of approximately 80.16.

 

Comparison:

1. Pre-Test Mean Scores:

Meditation Group: The mean was approximately 80.16.

Control Group: The mean was approximately 78.84.

The Meditation Group exhibited a slightly higher mean pre-test score compared to the Control Group.

 

2. Post-Test Mean Scores:

Meditation Group: The mean was approximately 88.44.

Control Group: The mean was approximately 80.16.

The Meditation Group demonstrated a significantly higher mean post-test score in contrast to the Control Group.

These findings indicate that, on average, participants in the Meditation Group attained higher scores both before and after the meditation program compared to those in the Control Group. Moreover, the Meditation Group manifested a substantial improvement from pre-test to post-test, suggesting the potential beneficial effects of the meditation program on learning outcomes.

 

Based on the results of paired and independent t-tests, the hypotheses formulated for a study that investigated the effects of a four-week mindfulness meditation program on college students' cognitive performance and well-being were evaluated. The null hypothesis (H0) posited no significant differences in learning outcomes, confidence in key concepts, ability to apply principles, study habits, and stress/anxiety frequency between the Meditation Group (n = 25) and the Control Group (n = 25), while the alternative hypothesis (H1) proposed that the Meditation Group would exhibit notable improvements in these domains post-program compared to the Control Group. Paired t-tests within the Meditation Group revealed statistically significant enhancements in learning outcomes (t(24) = -4.55, p < 0.001), confidence in key concepts (t(24) = -6.82, p < 0.001), ability to apply principles (t(24) = -6.16, p < 0.001), and a significant reduction in stress/anxiety frequency (p < 0.001), all supporting H1. However, no significant changes were observed in study habits (t(24) = 0.06, p = 0.952). In contrast, the Control Group showed no significant improvements in learning outcomes (t(24) = 0.24, p = 0.814), confidence in key concepts (t(24) = -0.22, p = 0.828), ability to apply principles (t(24) = -0.20, p = 0.844), or stress/anxiety frequency (p = 0.332), thus corroborating H0. The independent t-tests between the Meditation and Control Groups post-program revealed significant differences in learning outcomes (t(48) = 7.89, p < 0.001), confidence in key concepts (t(48) = 6.73, p < 0.001), ability to apply principles (t(48) = 8.51, p < 0.001), and stress/anxiety frequency (p = 0.001), all in favor of H1. These findings suggest that the mindfulness meditation program led to substantial improvements in learning outcomes, confidence, ability to apply principles, and stress/anxiety reduction among college students compared to those who did not participate in the program.

 

Suggestions based on the outcomes of this research included incorporating meditation programs into educational institutions' curricula or extracurricular activities to enhance students' cognitive abilities and overall well-being. Additionally, training was provided for educators to integrate mindfulness techniques into teaching practices, contributing to fostering a supportive learning environment. Awareness campaigns aimed at students, faculty, and parents were essential to highlight the benefits of meditation for academic performance and mental health. Recommendations stemming from the study emphasized the importance of conducting longer-term studies to explore sustained effects, diversifying meditation programs to accommodate varying preferences, and promoting interdisciplinary research collaborations to understand underlying mechanisms better. However, the research also acknowledged several limitations, including potential biases in sampling and measurement, the need to address instructor variability, and the importance of considering diverse academic settings when generalizing findings. Recognizing and mitigating these limitations was crucial for interpreting study results accurately and guiding future research efforts effectively.

 

V. CONCLUSIONS

 

In summary, the methodology of this study, led by faculty members and staff of the EdTech Research Association, aimed to rigorously examine the effects of a four-week meditation program on learning outcomes among college students. Employing a quasi-experimental design with pre-test and post-test measures, the study involved 50 college students randomly assigned to either the Meditation Group or the Control Group, with a focus on full-time participants committed to the entire program. Utilizing various research tools, including standardized tests, subjective assessments, and observation checklists, the Meditation Group engaged in structured meditation sessions led by a certified instructor. Ethical considerations were paramount throughout the research process. The statistical analysis, detailed in Appendix-2, revealed significant improvements in learning outcomes, confidence, ability to apply principles, and a reduction in stress/anxiety within the Meditation Group compared to the Control Group. These findings support the alternative hypothesis (H1) and suggest a positive impact of the meditation program on academic performance and well-being. Recommendations for educators, administrators, and policymakers include the incorporation of meditation programs, faculty training, and awareness-raising initiatives. However, acknowledging research limitations, such as issues related to external validity and sampling representativeness, is essential for interpreting the study's findings and guiding future research efforts. Overall, this study contributes valuable insights into the potential benefits of meditation on certain aspects of learning and well-being among college students.

 

COMPETING INTERESTS

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

 

AUTHOR’S CONTRIBUTIONS

Khritish Swargiary: Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, visualization, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing; Kavita Roy; supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript OR The author has read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

 

FUNDING INFORMATION

Not applicable.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Not Applicable.

 

ETHICS AND CONSENT

I, KHRITISH SWARGIARY, a Research Assistant, EdTech Research Associations, India hereby declares that the research conducted for the article titled "Meditation Matters: Enhancing Learning Outcomes and Well-Being Among College Students" adheres to the ethical guidelines set forth by the EdTech Research Association (ERA). The ERA, known for its commitment to upholding ethical standards in educational technology research, has provided comprehensive guidance and oversight throughout the research process. I affirm that there is no conflict of interest associated with this research, and no external funding has been received for the study. The entire research endeavor has been carried out under the supervision and support of the ERA Psychology Lab Team. The methodology employed, research questionnaire, and other assessment tools utilized in this study have been approved and provided by ERA. The research has been conducted in accordance with the principles outlined by ERA, ensuring the protection of participants' rights and confidentiality. Ethical approval for this research has been granted by the EdTech Research Association under the reference number 09-22/56/ERA/2023. Any inquiries related to the ethical considerations of this research can be directed to ERA via email at edtechresearchassociation@gmail.com. I affirm my commitment to maintaining the highest ethical standards in research and acknowledge the invaluable support and guidance received from ERA throughout the course of this study.

 

REFERENCES

 

1)    D. S. Ludwig and J. Kabat-Zinn, “Mindfulness in medicine,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 300, no. 11, pp. 1350–1352, 2008.

2)    A. Grecucci, E. Pappaianni, R. Siugzdaite, A. Theuninck, and R. Job, “Mindful emotion regulation: exploring the neurocognitive mechanisms behind mindfulness,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 670724, 9 pages, 2015.

3)    M. J. Ott, “Mindfulness meditation: a path of transformation & healing,” Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 22–29, 2004.

4)    J. M. G. Williams, C. Crane, T. Barnhofer et al., “Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for preventing relapse in recurrent depression: a randomized dismantling trial,” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 275–286, 2014.

5)    J. E. Bower, A. D. Crosswell, A. L. Stanton et al., “Mindfulness meditation for younger breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial,” Cancer, vol. 121, no. 8, pp. 1231–1240, 2015.

6)    J. D. Creswell, H. F. Myers, S. W. Cole, and M. R. Irwin, “Mindfulness meditation training effects on CD4+ T lymphocytes in HIV-1 infected adults: a small randomized controlled trial,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 184–188, 2009.

7)    R. Simpson, J. Booth, M. Lawrence, S. Byrne, F. Mair, and S. Mercer, “Mindfulness based interventions in multiple sclerosis—a systematic review,” BMC Neurology, vol. 14, article 15, 2014.

8)    S. Banth and M. D. Ardebil, “Effectiveness of mindfulness meditation on pain and quality of life of patients with chronic low back pain,” International Journal of Yoga, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 128–133, 2015.

9)    J. C. Ong, R. Manber, Z. Segal, Y. Xia, S. Shapiro, and J. K. Wyatt, “A randomized controlled trial of mindfulness meditation for chronic insomnia,” Sleep, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1553–1563, 2014.

10) J. Park, R. H. Lyles, and S. Bauer-Wu, “Mindfulness meditation lowers muscle sympathetic nerve activity and blood pressure in African-American males with chronic kidney disease,” American Journal of Physiology—Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 307, no. 1, pp. R93–R101, 2014.

11) A. B. Morrison, M. Goolsarran, S. L. Rogers, and A. P. Jha, “Taming a wandering attention: short-form mindfulness training in student cohorts,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 7, article 897, 2014.

12) P. A. M. van den Hurk, F. Giommi, S. C. Gielen, A. E. M. Speckens, and H. P. Barendregt, “Greater efficiency in attentional processing related to mindfulness meditation,” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 1168–1180, 2010.

13) A. Chiesa, R. Calati, and A. Serretti, “Does mindfulness training improve cognitive abilities? A systematic review of neuropsychological findings,” Clinical Psychology Review, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 449–464, 2011.

14) A. Moore and P. Malinowski, “Meditation, mindfulness and cognitive flexibility,” Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 176–186, 2009.

15) J. Greenberg, K. Reiner, and N. Meiran, “‘Mind the trap’: mindfulness practice reduces cognitive rigidity,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 5, Article ID e36206, 2012.

16) M. D. Keye and A. M. Pidgeon, “An investigation of the relationship between resilience, mindfulness, and academic self-efficacy,” Open Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 1–4, 2013.

17) F. B. Newton, E. Kim, D. Wilcox, and N. Beemer, Administration and Scoring Manual for the College Learning Effectiveness Inventory (CLEI), 2008, http://www.k-state.edu/counseling/faculty/CLEI_Manual.pdf.

18) P. S. Chen, Investigation of efficacy scale of the revised Chinese version of the College Learning Effectiveness Inventory [M.S. thesis], National Hsinchu University of Education, 2010 (Chinese).

19) W. Schneider, A. Eschman, and A. Zuccolotto, E-Prime User's Guide, Psychology Software Tools, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, 2002.

20) C. Regehr, D. Glancy, and A. Pitts, “Interventions to reduce stress in university students: a review and meta-analysis,” Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 148, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2013.

21) P. L. Dobkin and T. A. Hutchinson, “Teaching mindfulness in medical school: where are we now and where are we going?” Medical Education, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 768–779, 2013.

22) D. S. Black and R. Fernando, “Mindfulness training and classroom behavior among lower-income and ethnic minority elementary school children,” Journal of Child and Family Studies, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 1242–1246, 2014.

23) F. Zeidan, S. K. Johnson, B. J. Diamond, Z. David, and P. Goolkasian, “Mindfulness meditation improves cognition: evidence of brief mental training,” Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 597–605, 2010.

24) Y.-Y. Tang, L. Yang, L. D. Leve, and G. T. Harold, “Improving executive function and its neurobiological mechanisms through a mindfulness-based intervention: advances within the field of developmental neuroscience,” Child Development Perspectives, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 361–366, 2012.

25) F. Zeidan, S. K. Johnson, N. S. Gordon, and P. Goolkasian, “Effects of brief and sham mindfulness meditation on mood and cardiovascular variables,” Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 867–873, 2010.

 

 

 

APPENDIX 1

Sample Characteristics

Participant	Gender	Age	Academic Discipline
1	Female	22	Psychology
2	Female	21	Biology
3	Female	23	Engineering
4	Female	22	History
5	Female	23	Economics
6	Male	21	Computer Science
7	Male	20	Physics
8	Male	22	Chemistry
9	Male	23	Mathematics
10	Male	21	Sociology
11	Female	22	Political Science
12	Female	23	Literature
13	Female	20	Business
14	Female	21	Environmental Science
15	Male	22	Art History
16	Male	23	Music
17	Male	20	Geology
18	Male	21	Communications
19	Male	22	Anthropology
20	Male	23	Philosophy
21	Female	20	Nursing
22	Female	21	Linguistics
23	Female	22	Chemistry
24	Female	23	Computer Engineering
25	Male	20	Physics

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Below was a standardized questionnaire that could be used to assess learning outcomes before and after the meditation program. The same questionnaire was administered for both the pre-test and post-test to measure any changes in learning outcomes.

 

A) Learning Outcomes Assessment Questionnaire

Please answer the following questions based on your understanding of the academic subject you have chosen to study.

Participant Information:

-    Name (Optional):

-    Gender: [ ] Male [ ] Female

-    Age:                      

-    Academic Discipline:                               

 

B) Pre-Test

Please rate your current level of understanding and confidence in your chosen academic subject on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest.

1.  How confident are you in your understanding of the key concepts in your academic subject?

[ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5

2.     How well do you feel you can apply the principles you've learned in your academic subject to practical situations?

[ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5

3.  How effective are your study habits in preparing for exams and assignments in your academic subject?

[ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5

4.  How often do you experience stress or anxiety related to your academic subject? [1] Rarely [2] Occasionally [3] Sometimes [4] Often [5] Very Often

 

C) Post-Test

Please rate your current level of understanding and confidence in your chosen academic subject after completing the meditation program. Use the same scale as in the pre-test.

1.  How confident are you in your understanding of the key concepts in your academic subject?

[ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5

2.     How well do you feel you can apply the principles you've learned in your academic subject to practical situations?

[ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5

3.  How effective are your study habits in preparing for exams and assignments in your academic subject?

[ ] 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5

4.  How often do you experience stress or anxiety related to your academic subject? [1] Rarely [2] Occasionally [3] Sometimes [4] Often [5] Very Often

Additional Comments (if any): [Provide space for participants to write any additional comments or observations regarding their experiences during the meditation program and its impact on their learning.]

_____End of Questionnaire_____

Please ensure that participants complete the questionnaire both before and after the meditation program. This is essential for assessing the changes in their learning outcomes and determining any potential effects of meditation on their academic performance.